<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.chrishambly.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>no-follow</title>
 <link>http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/no-follow</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>iFollow</title>
 <link>http://www.chrishambly.com/content/ifollow</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote this page so that you do not have to &quot;view source&quot; to ascertain if I use the &quot;no-follow&quot; tag in the comments section of this Blog, or not. By reading this you can be safe in the knowledge that I do not employ it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow target=_blank&gt;no-follow&lt;/a&gt; tag was invented as a method of trying to eliminate Blog comment spam, which was playing havoc with dear Google&#039;s algorithm. So what you&#039;ll discover now is that the majority of Blogging platforms now ship with the &quot;no-follow&quot; tag included in the code. You can easily check that out by &quot;viewing source&quot; and looking at the HTML itself, if you do not know what that means it&#039;s time to learn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No-follow?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, this is a snippet of code which instructs search engine robots to not follow urls in a web, or more to the point, to not pass on any &lt;a href=http://www.google.com/technology/ target=_blank&gt;page rank&lt;/a&gt; to the linked page. The logic here is that unscrupulous webmasters/mistresses were using robots (still do) to automatically post comments with a url back to their site which they are/were pimping.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why take it out?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have not employed it on my Blog here because I think that if you are kind enough to come along and leave a comment the least I can do is share some Google Juice back to your site, it would be pretty selfish otherwise, which is common practise actually. As well as that I have an anti-spam comment system in place which is perfectly adequate of detecting a human.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.chrishambly.com/content/ifollow#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/engines">engines</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/google-juice">google juice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/no-follow">no-follow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/page-rank">page rank</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/ranking">ranking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/robots">robots</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/search">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chrishambly.com/category/tags/spam">spam</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:13:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chrishambly</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">264 at http://www.chrishambly.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
